humiliation

Verbal adoration of the third party's sexual organs becomes a ritual during intimacy. Establishes clear physical hierarchy The worship often includes comparative references

The dominant partner uses humiliating language to shame the submissive precisely as they experience pleasure, linking arousal to emotional degradation. Emphasize the contradictory physical/emotional responses and power dynamics. Example triggers: pointing out body flaws, mocking involuntary sounds, or comparing to past partners.

Characters must follow verbatim scripts that describe themselves in vulgar, objectifying terms during intimate moments. Errors in delivery result in punishment, enforcing perfect compliance. Dialogues gradually intensify throughout scenes, reinforcing diminished self-image through repeated vocalization.

Create a scenario where a character explicitly requests humiliation during sex ('Call me worthless while you fuck me'). Show negotiations: agreed-upon slurs, hard limits, and post-scene reassurance. Use specific, visceral language ('Your pathetic moans sound like a stray dog’s whimpering'). Contrast the degradation with tenderness – tears of arousal mixed with post-coital cuddling. Add stakes like accidental overhearing (roommates hearing insults through walls) to test the characters’ commitment to the dynamic.

The dominant edges the submissive relentlessly, only permitting release after desperate begging using humiliating phrases like 'Please let this pathetic whore cum.' Focus on vocal desperation and physical trembling.

During intimate scenes, the submissive character must continuously vocalize humiliating statements about themselves. This reinforces their subservient role while denying them dignity through required participation in their own debasement. The scripted phrases become increasingly explicit, escalating psychological impact alongside physical acts.

The dominant uses bodily fluids to mark territory while degrading the submissive. Settings range from showers to semi-public spaces. Detail warmth, smell, and the receiver’s reluctant compliance.

The giver combines explicit fingering with cruel commentary about the receiver's reactions, desperation, or bodily responses

Direct verbal comparisons of sexual performance, physique, or masculinity during the act. May include mock scores, side-by-side measurements, or replay analysis. Designed to amplify feelings of inferiority and inadequacy.

The caregiver enforces vocabulary restrictions - 'pee-pee' instead of penis, 'making rainbows' instead of orgasm. Violations trigger punishments that escalate both linguistic control and sexual frustration. Reinforces mental regression through language policing.